WATCH LIVE: House holds first public hearing in impeachment case against President Trump

Accused Indianapolis drug boss Richard Grundy’s fate now in hands of jury

EVANSVILLE, Ind.– The fates of accused Indianapolis drug boss Richard Grundy III and four alleged co-conspirators are in the hands of 12 jurors at U.S. District Court in Evansville.

Grundy is accused of spearheading an operation that allegedly brought methamphetamine, cocaine, heroin and marijuana worth $3.5 million from Phoenix, Arizona, to Indianapolis between August, 2016, and November, 2017.

Dubbed “Operation Electric Avenue” by the FBI, the investigation resulted in indictments against two dozen people, alleging combinations of 20 criminal charges, including conspiracy, money laundering and possession with intent to sell.

Grundy faces a potential life sentence if convicted. Alongside him, Undrae Moseby, James Beasley, Ezell Neville and Derek Atwater are among the last handful of defendants who still face charges.

The majority of the other defendants either resolved their cases or pleaded guilty, some of them returning to court over the past three weeks to testify against Grundy and the other men.

“I think David Carroll was a drug dealer,” said Grundy’s attorney Kenneth Riggins. “Emilio Mitchell II is a drug dealer. Joseph Webster was a drug dealer, and all I did was highlight that. Those are the people who admit what they did wrong and we’ll see what the jury thinks about all that.”

Assistant U.S. Attorney Brad Blackington, in his final summation to jurors, maintained that while defense attorneys found the witnesses unreliable, their clients trusted their one-time partners enough to invite them into the original drug dealing conspiracy.

Witnesses from both Phoenix and Indianapolis testified that Grundy helped organize the ring’s finances and dispatched couriers to Arizona to trade the money for drugs and then oversaw the narcotics distribution through a series of local street dealers.

Grundy and Moseby both maintain that their frequent trips to Phoenix, often traveling under assumed names, were intended to further the rap music career of another conspirator or Grundy’s recording company.

“He’s had the record company for a while now and I was able to see it on YouTube,” said Riggins. “The MOB Family is the name. MOB Family Entertainment. He’s been doing it for quite a while You see the videos. They’re professional.”

Jurors were shown two Grundy-affiliated videos, one of them depicting the fate that befalls witnesses who cooperate with law enforcement.

“He went out there to promote his business at each of the locations,” said Riggins, “and I said that all those states, Texas, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada, those are locations as well as Illinois, but he went to promote the company and that’s all I know.”

In his closing arguments, Blackington knitted together a web of evidence including surveillance videos, eyewitness accounts, travel, cell phone and text records, wiretap transcripts and testimony from an informant who bought methamphetamine from one of the defendants before asking jurors to use their common sense in bringing back a series of guilty verdicts.

Attorneys for the other defendants claimed their clients were either drug users or independent dealers who were not necessarily part of a wider conspiracy.

The trial was moved to Evansville for security reasons after a confidential list of names of jurors chosen in Indianapolis last month was found in Grundy’s cell at the Marion County Jail resulting in a mistrial.

FOX59 has also learned that Evansville Police were advised of potential Grundy associates who had the potential to travel to southern Indiana to attend the trial.

The names of attendees were recorded by U.S. Marshals at the second of two security checkpoints outside the courtroom.

Members of Grundy’s family were present Wednesday when the defendant took the stand, claiming that he often hid his identity during the time of the investigation because, he said, he feared, “harassment by the police.”

Grundy also explained his tattoo of a dead rat expressed his disdain for informants who cooperate with investigators.

“I think he surprised everybody being on the witness stand and he did a stellar job for himself,” said Riggins.

Exiting the courtroom of Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson, each juror carried two large binders of documents, indicating the sheer volume of information the jury will need to weigh to reach a multitude of verdicts in the case which could result in lengthy deliberations.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.